Globalization
has made a tremendous impact on all spheres of our life and education is no
exception. It has given rise to a lot of challenges in education especially on
the quality of education. To meet these growing demands a lot of changes are
being made in the field of education and one such change is in the field of
learner evaluation. Evaluation is widely acknowledged as a powerful means of
improving the quality of education. It plays a key role in deciding what the
learners learn and what the teachers teach in schools. Effectively planned
evaluation can promote learning, build confidence and develop students'
understanding of themselves as active learners. The introduction of Continuous
and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) is considered as one of the major steps
taken in this regard to improve and strengthen the quality of learner
evaluation. Continuous evaluation is an approach that would capture the full
range of learners' performance. CCE will lead to diagnosis, remediation and
enhancement of learning.
CCE refers Continuous & Comprehensive
Evaluation, a system of school based assessment that covers all the aspects
of a student’s development. It was designed to reduce the student stress
related to board exams, and to introduce a uniform and comprehensive pattern
for student evaluation across the country. It emphasizes on two broad
objectives: (a) Continuity in Evaluation and (b) Assessment of broad based
learning. Clearly, it attempts to shift emphasis from ‘testing’ to ‘holistic
learning’ with an aim of creating young adults, possessing appropriate skills
and desirable qualities in addition to academic excellence.
Teachers and
administrators would thus be able to assess learners' progress and would have
time to correct the problems. According to National Curriculum Framework (NCF,
2005) CCE has frequently been cited as the only meaningful kind of evaluation
and it also requires much more careful thinking through about when it is to be
employed in a system effectively. Such evaluation places a lot of demand on
teachers' time and ability to maintain meticulous records if it is to be
meaningfully executed and if it is to have any reliability as an assessment.
Objectives
of CCE -
1.
Encourage
development of cognitive skills and de-emphasize rote learning
2.
Make
the entire education process a student-centric activity
3.
Help
develop cognitive, psychomotor and interpersonal skills
4.
Make
holistic evaluation an integral part of entire education process
5.
Improve
student's accomplishments through regular diagnostics and remedial instructions
6.
Use
evaluation to control quality and maintain desired performance
7.
Take
decisions about the learner, learning process and learning environment by
determining social utility, desirability & effectiveness of the program
Comprehensive
Evaluation
1. Scholastic Evaluation
2. Co- Scholastic Evaluation
The ‘comprehensive’ component of CCE takes care of
assessment of all round development of the child’s personality. It includes
assessment in Scholastic as well as Co-Scholastic aspects of the pupil’s
growth.
Assessment in
Scholastic areas is done informally and formally using multiple techniques of
evaluation continually and periodically. There are 2 types of Assessments, in
an academic year, to test the Scholastic areas: Formative Assessment (FA)
and Summative Assessment (SA)
Formative
Assessment: FA
is carried out as a part of the instruction methodology and provides continuous
feedback to both the teachers and the learners. It comprises of Class work,
Homework, Oral questions, Quizzes, Projects, and Assignments/Tests etc.
Summative
Assessment: Summative
assessment is carried out at the end of a term. It measures how much a student
has learnt from the course and is usually a graded test i.e. Examination.
Evaluation
of Scholastic Areas (2) An
academic year is divided into 2 terms and in each term there will be 2 FAs
& 1 SA and weightage is allotted to each in the following manner
Formative
Assessment totals to 40% and Summative Assessment totals to 60% and grades are
given on a 9 point grading scale.
Assessment
in Co-Scholastic areas is done using multiple techniques on the basis of
identified criteria. Assessment of Co-scholastic areas is done at the end of
the year on a 5 point grading scale. Co-Scholastic areas of evaluation include
1.
Life
Skills i.e. Thinking, Social & Emotional Skills
2.
Attitude
& Values i.e. towards Teachers, School-mates, School Programs, Environment
and the Value System
3.
Co-curricular
Activities which are further divided into
Activities
- Literary & Creative Skills, Scientific Skills, Visual & Performing
Arts, Leadership & Organization Skills and other Co-curricular activities,
Health
and Physical Education, that includes areas like Sports, NCC, and Gardening
etc.
The role
and importance of Co-scholastic areas of evaluation has been further emphasized
by an up-gradation policy of CBSE that allows students to upgrade their
Scholastic grades depending on performance in co-scholastic areas.
Challenges
Faced
1. CCE
implemented in a hurry, thus teachers are still very much on the starting block
in terms of comprehension and adoption of CCE
2. The
success of CCE is largely hinged on the adoption of the model by the teachers
3. So far,
our teachers have been conditioned to the traditional system of evaluation and
will take time to understand, apply and realize the value of the CCE
4. It is
an evolving methodology which implies teachers need to be continually educated
to ensure that they are equipped with necessary knowledge and skills
5. Due to
hasty implementation of CCE students are facing increased stress and pressure
in the form of project work
6. Implementation
ambiguity at teacher’s level has resulted into an overdose of project work for
students, resulting in lesser time for self-study
7. A
typical report card runs into 6-7 pages
8. Manual
generation of report cards can take anywhere between a couple of weeks to a
month
9. Although
the entire process of student evaluation is decentralized, CBSE holds control
on issuing the final certificate of assessment to Class X students which requires
schools to send student’s performance data for Classes IX & X
electronically to the board at the end of the academic session that further
calls for maintenance of performance data in different formats by the school,
resulting in duplication of effort
10. Result
is increased stress for teachers
11. No
uniform model of recording the assessment has been followed anywhere so far
12. Personal
attention for the students by the teachers, which is important for the success
of CCE, is not possible in many schools as the student-teacher ratio is widely
skewed, ranging from 40 to 60, thus resulting in ‘efficiency and effectiveness’
related issues